Legal Opinion
Iseminger v. Holden
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided December 30, 1976No. 59338PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORGAN, Judge.
The application of appellant-defendant to have this cause transferred from the Kansas City District of the Court of Appeals having been sustained, we consider the same “as on original appeal.” Mo.Const., Art. 5, Sec. 10.
Respondents-plaintiffs, husband and wife, filed suit wherein they alleged that defendant negligently caused her motor vehicle to strike the automobile in which plaintiffs were riding. Recovery was sought for personal injuries, loss of consortium and certain medical expenses. To establish the same, counsel for plaintiffs had four exhibits admitted and passed to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Murray Grayson and Southern Freightways, Inc., a Corporation v. Earold E. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- Kickham v. CarterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
- Hamilton v. SloverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
- Roth v. ChatlosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Clough v. SchwartzSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Washington Ex Rel. Washington v. Barnes HospitalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
- Ina M. Overton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- June Hannah v. Bill Haskins, D/B/A Cloverleaf Fertilizer Company and Dwayne Elvin Bentley, Kirk National Leasing Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- Charles Woods Television Corp. v. Capital Cities/abc, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- Beck v. Edison Bros. Stores, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.