Legal Opinion

Kellogg v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 6, 1889PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Wilkin county, C. L. Brown, J., presiding, refusing a new trial after verdict for defendants.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

Action of claim and delivery, the plaintiff alleging in his complaint ownership and right of possession, April 29, 1885, of “three red oxen, five years old, and one black ox, five years old,” and that defendants on said day unlawfully took and thereafter unjustly detained the same. By the answer plaintiff’s title and right to possess the cattle were put in issue, and upon the trial a verdict was had for defendants. To maintain his claim to the cattle, plaintiff introduced in evidence an alleged copy of a chattel mortgage, executed by one Henry Eaymond to him, bearing date January 3, 1885, in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tolbert v. HortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  2. Boice v. BoiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
  3. Ellingsen v. CookeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re A. E. Fountain, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  2. First National Bank of Madison v. HalvorsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API