Legal Opinion

Zulver v. Roberts

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 20, 1932No. [No. 14, April Term, 1932.]PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDigges, J.

This is the plaintiff’s appeal from a judgment on the verdict of a jury in the Baltimore City Court in favor of the defendant below. The record contains two exceptions, one to a ruling on eyidence, and the other to- the action of the court in granting certain of the defendant’s prayers. The only prayer offered by the plaintiff was a damage prayer, which was granted; while the defendant offered five prayers, numbered one, two-, three, four, and six, all of which were granted, the first, fourth, and sixth with modifications made by the court.

The facts, briefly stated, are that on the- evening…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United Railways & Electric Co. v. CarnealCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
  2. Wise v. AckermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
  3. State v. Wash., B. A.R. Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
  4. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. State ex rel. FryerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
  5. Wash., B. A. Elec. R. Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bloom v. Good Humor Ice Cream Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
  2. State, Use of Taylor v. BarllyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  3. Taylor v. ArmigerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  4. Mumford Ex Rel. Mumford v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1957
  5. Stafford v. ZakeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API