Nancy Corinne Dyer and J. Raymond Dyer v. Securities and Exchange Commission
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSEN, Chief Judge.
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 made it unlawful for anyone to solicit proxies “in respect of any security (other than an exempted security) registered on any national securities exchange in contravention of such rules and regula tions as the Commission may prescribe as necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors.” 15 U.S.C.A. § 78n(a).
Similarly, the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 made it unlawful to solicit proxies as to any registered holding company “in contravention of such rules and regulations or orders as the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Transamerica Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- Dyer v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
- Securities And Exchange Commission v. Mitchell May, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Nancy Corinne Dyer and J. Raymond Dyer v. Securities and Exchange Commission, Union Electric Company, Intervenor-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
- Nancy Corinne Dyer and J. Raymond Dyer v. Securities and Exchange Commission, Union Electric Company, Intervenor-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- J. Raymond Dyer v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
- J. Raymond Dyer and Jean Russell Dyer v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965