Nancy Corinne Dyer and J. Raymond Dyer v. Securities and Exchange Commission, Union Electric Company, Intervenor-Respondent
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSEN, Chief Judge.
I
This proceeding is one under 15 U.S.C.A. § 79x(a), for review of an order of the Securities and Exchange Commission, which permitted a declaration, as amended, filed by the management of Union Electric Company, of St. Louis Missouri, to become effective as a basis for the solicitation of proxies from stockholders for the corporation’s 1957 annual meeting.
A requirement had precedingly been made by the Commission, on the basis of section 12(e) of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, 15 U.S.C.A. § 79Ɩ(e), and Rule U-62 of the Commission’s regulations, 17 CFR §…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wong Yang Sung v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. OkinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Dyer v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
- Nancy Corinne Dyer and J. Raymond Dyer v. Securities and Exchange Commission, Union Electric Company, Acorporation, Intervenor-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
- Dyer v. Securities and Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
3Cited by11 opinions
- J. Raymond Dyer v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
- J. Raymond Dyer and Jean Russell Dyer v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Nancy Corinne Dyer and J. Raymond Dyer v. Securities and Exchange Commission, Union Electric Company, Intervenor-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
- Dyer v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
- Meredith v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.