Legal Opinion

Epson America, Inc. v. USA111, Inc.

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided April 26, 2017No. CA No. 0:17-cv-00129-CMCPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion and Order Granting Motion for Preliminary Injunction

CAMERON MCGOWAN CURRIE, Senior United States District Judge

On January 17, 2017, Plaintiff Epson America, Inc. (“Epson”) filed a Complaint alleging Defendant USA111, Inc., d/b/a iR-ULU (“iRULU”) made false statements in advertising its consumer projectors, specifically a model called the BL20. Epson seeks, inter alia, injunctive relief restraining iRULU from engaging in false advertising and ordering removal of false advertisements from iRULU’s projector product listings. Entry No. 1, Compl. ¶ 44. The central allegation is iRULU’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
Blackwelder Furniture Company of Statesville, Inc. v. Seilig Manufacturing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
Direx Israel, Ltd. Direx, Incorporated v. Breakthrough Medical Corporation Zvi Porath Avner SpectorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
Real Truth About Obama, Inc. v. Federal Election CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
In re Microsoft Corporation Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.