Legal Opinion

State v. Allen

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 6, 1991No. 55454PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAROHL, Judge.

Defendant appeals conviction of possession of a controlled substance, phencycli-dine. Section 195.020 RSMo 1986. Defendant claims the evidence was insufficient to support a guilty verdict and was the product of an illegal search and seizure. We affirm.

The search and seizure issue will be disposed of first because that activity elicited the evidence necessary to charge the defendant, namely the drug. On May 20, 1987, at approximately 10:00 a.m., Officer Thomas Crowley observed defendant driving a white 1976 Buick. He noticed the license plate was a November plate, but the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. State v. MilliornSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  3. State v. BarberSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  4. State v. ApplewhiteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. State v. WillersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. Villa-PerezSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  2. State v. FarrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. State v. GonzalezMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. State v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. State v. GrovesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API