Legal Opinion

Neelley v. Farr

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 21, 1916No. Nos. 8683, 8684, 8685, 8686PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Error to Huerfano County Court. Hon. Henry Blickhahn, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

These are election contests growing out of the general election in Huerfano county in November, 1914. The state*488ments of contests filed are in all respects identical, with the exception that different offices are involved, and different pluralities returned by the board of canvassers.

The plaintiff in error, E. L. Neelley, contested the election of J. B. Farr, defendant in error, for the office of Sheriff. Plaintiff in error, J. G. Archuleta, contested the election of defendant in error, W. H. Freeland, for the office of County Clerk and Recorder. Plaintiff in error, Charles H. Sanchez,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. People ex rel. Grinnell v. HoffmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  3. State ex rel. Schuet v. MurrayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  4. DeWalt v. Bartley, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1892
  5. Jones v. GlidewellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1890

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Bowe v. Secretary of CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  2. DeMille v. American Federation of Radio ArtistsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Slater v. VarneyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Taylor v. NuetzelCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  5. State Ex Rel. Dostert v. RigglemanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1972

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API