Legal Opinion

Wallerbeck v. Haaven

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 20, 1933No. 29,523Published

1Opinion of the Court

LORING, Justice.

In an action for conversion the defendants had a directed verdict. Plaintiffs have appealed from an order denying their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.

December 18, 3929, R. T. Adams recovered a judgment in the municipal court of East Grand Forks against Helleck Volden. A transcript was filed in the district court of Polk county and the judgment and all rights thereunder assigned to defendant Krutzner. .August 8, 3932, an execution thereon was issued and placed in the hands of the sheriff of Polk county. A deputy sheriff on that day made what…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Beekman v. LansingNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  2. First Nat'l Bk. v. Corp. Comm.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1932
  3. Quackenbush v. HenryMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Horgan v. LyonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  5. Barber v. AmundsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API