Cartersville Candlewick Inc. v. Huiet
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Groves, Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The plaintiff claims to have succeeded to the benefit-experience rating of Candlewick Yarn Mills, by reason of an amendment to section 7 (c) 7 (iv) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, passed by the General Assembly in 1943, which amendment provided in part: “That any corporation . . or other legal entity, who acquires by purchase, merger, consolidation, or other means, substantially all of the business or assets thereof, of any employer and who thereafter continues such acquired business, shall be deemed to be a successor to the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cooper v. RollinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Wright v. HirschSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Neal v. MoultrieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
- City of Newnan v. Atlanta Laundries Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1932
- Woolworth Co. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Brookins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
- Canada Dry Bottling Co. v. Board of Review, Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1950
- McElroy v. McCordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- McNear v. DIRECTOR OF THE DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SEC.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
- Sale v. LeachmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.