Legal Opinion
Skrupky v. Hartford Fire Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided October 5, 1972No. 190PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
Does the time limitation for the commencement of an action after a loss, as provided in the policy, apply to (a) a cause of action alleging a breach of warranty, (b) a cause of action alleging negligence in failing to prepare the policy of full coverage?
The policy provision giving rise to the dispute is as follows:
“No suit or action on this policy for the recovery of any claim shall be sustainable in any court of law or equity unless all the requirements of this policy shall have been complied with, and unless commenced within twelve months next after the inception of the loss.”
This provision…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Artmar, Inc. v. United Fire & Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Riteway Builders, Inc. v. First National Insurance Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Chavez v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
3Cited by11 opinions
- Warmka v. Hartland Cicero Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Hearn v. RickenbackerMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
- Martin v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Villa Clement, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
- Ensz v. Brown Insurance AgencyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.