Legal Opinion

Frenkil v. Hagan

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 7, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAjoktNS, J.

Isaac Frenkil and Samuel M. Frenkil, trading as Baltimore Plumbing and Supply Company, purchased a lot of black steel pipe at a public auction, held at Norfolk, Virginia, by the Eastern Surplus Property Control of the War Department of the United States Government for $12,241.10, malting a deposit of $1,200 cash, together with a letter of credit from the National Bank of Baltimore, whereby said bank agreed to accept a ninety-day draft against said company accompanied by bill of lading covering the whole or any part of said pipe, the total of said draft not to exceed $11,041.10, the company…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. STANTON v. Embrey, AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Tool Co. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  3. Noble v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  4. Wright v. TebbittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. Sherley v. SherleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Maryland Transportation Authority Police Lodge 34 v. Maryland Transportation AuthorityCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  2. United States Potash Co. v. McNuttCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  3. Eastern Woodworks, Inc. v. VanceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
  4. Maryland Transportation Authority v. Maryland Transportation Authority Police Lodge 34Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  5. Mta v. Mta PoliceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API