Legal Opinion
ADECCO INC. v. Dollar
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided March 7, 2011No. 107967. Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 4PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOUG GABBARD II, Vice Chief Judge.
1 1 Petitioners, Adecco Inc., 1 and American Home Assurance (collectively, Employer), seek review of a workers' compensation court order awarding benefits for psychological overlay to Respondent, Patricia Dollar (Claimant). For the reasons set forth below, we sustain the workers' compensation court's decision. We deny Claimant's motion to tax costs.
BACKGROUND
[ 2 In September 2004, Claimant sustained a work-related, cumulative trauma injury to her back for which she was awarded temporary total disability (TTD) benefits per a workers' compensation court order…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Christian v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Bd. of Regents, Etc. v. Natl. Collegiate Athletic Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Sharp v. 251st Street Landfill, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Bostick Tank Truck Service v. NixSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Joe Brown Co. v. MeltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- 1st Staffing Group USA v. BrawleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013