Legal Opinion

City of Elyria v. Hebebrand

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 20, 1993No. 92CA005329PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cacioppo, Judge.

Ralph T. Hebebrand appeals his conviction for driving under the influence and failure to keep an assured clear distance.

Assignment of Error III

“The court improperly allowed testimony as to the pre-arrest breath tests administered by Trooper Cross over the objection of the defendant.”

In his third assignment of error, Hebebrand argues that the trial court erred by allowing Trooper Ronald Cross to testify about Hebebrand’s performance on a pre-arrest breathalyzer test (“PBT”). We agree.

To determine the admissibility of a PBT, this court looks to Ohio’s drunk driving statute. It…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State v. OttenOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. State v. BridgemanOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. WaddyOhio Supreme Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. DillehayOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. State v. ShulerOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. State v. Ahmed, 2007-Ca-00049 (2-4-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API