Legal Opinion
DeFreitas v. TIG Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 14, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action for a judgment declaring that the defendant TIG Insurance Company is obligated to defend and indemnify the defendants Enrique M. Calderon and Janet Calderon in an underlying action entitled DeFreitas v Calderon, pending in the Supreme Court, Queens County, under Index No. 20692/00, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Price, J.), dated October 23, 2003, which granted the motion of the defendant TIG Insurance Company for summary judgment and denied her cross motion for summary judgment declaring that the defendant TIG Insurance Company is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lanza v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- White v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Deso v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- United Talmudical Academy of Kiryas Joel, Inc. v. Cigna Property & Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- M&N Management Corp. v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ortiz v. Fage USA Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Maughn v. RLI InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Ortiz v. Fage USA Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013