Legal Opinion

United Talmudical Academy of Kiryas Joel, Inc. v. Cigna Property & Casualty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 3, 1998PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for a judgment declaring that the defendant is obligated to defend, indemnify, or reimburse its insured, the plaintiff United Talmudical Academy of Kiryas Joel, Inc., in an underlying negligence action entitled Jacobowitz v United Talmudical Academy, pending in the Supreme Court, Orange County, Index No. 1032/93, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Slobod, J.), dated August 4, 1997, which denied its motion for summary judgment declaring that it had no obligation to defend, indemnify, or reimburse the plaintiff and granted the plaintiffs cross…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Security Mutual Insurance v. Acker-Fitzsimons Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. White v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Argentina v. Otsego Mutual Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Merchants Mutual Insurance v. HoffmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. D'Aloia v. Travelers InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance v. MancusoNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. C.C.R. Realty of Dutchess, Inc. v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Seneca Insurance v. W.S. Distribution, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Donovan v. Empire Insurance GroupAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. Yarar v. Children's Museum of ManhattanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API