Legal Opinion

Bartholomew v. Pearce

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 14, 1994No. 91C11755; CA A72799PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment denying his petition for declaratory relief. Plaintiff sought a declaration that the visitation rules established by the Department of Corrections are unconstitutional.1 We remand with instructions to the trial court to dismiss the case.

On January 15,1991, plaintiff, an inmate at Oregon State Penitentiary, submitted a visiting application for his wife, who at the time was incarcerated at the Oregon Women’s Correctional Center. His wife had previously been convicted for violating ORS 162.185 (supplying contraband) and ORS 475.992 (possession of controlled…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bay River, Inc. v. Environmental Quality CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  2. Alto v. State Fire MarshalOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Federation of Oregon Parole & Probation Officers v. County of MarionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. Pen-Nor, Inc. v. Oregon Department of Higher EducationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Joint Council of Teamsters 37 v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API