Legal Opinion
Federation of Oregon Parole & Probation Officers v. County of Marion
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided September 14, 1988No. 145,786; CA A40740PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.
The Federation of Oregon Parole and Probation Officers (FOPPO), brought this declaratory judgment action against the Public Employes’ Retirement System and its Board (PERS) and Marion County (County), on behalf of its members, who are adult parole and probation officers employed by County. It contends, first, that those of its members who formerly were state parole and probation officers and who transferred to the employment of County under the Community Corrections Act, ORS 423.500 et seq, were entitled to retain, after their transfer, the enhanced “police officer” benefits that they…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bay River, Inc. v. Environmental Quality CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mendieta v. STATE, DIVISION OF STATE LANDSCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Lake County v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Wallace v. STATE EX REL. PERBCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Clarke Electric, Inc. v. State ex rel. State Highway DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Lone Oak Racing v. Oregon Racing Com'nCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.