Legal Opinion

Opportunity Christian Church v. Washington Water Power Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1925No. 19154. Department OnePublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.

— It is our opinion that the appellants are not in position to maintain this action.

There is certain fertile land in the Spokane valley which is quite valueless without irrigation. Water can be had only from wells. About 1905, three men owned some three thousand acres of this land, and desired to develop and sell it. They organized two corporations; one called Modern Irrigation & Land Company, and the other, Modern Electric Water Company. To the land company they conveyed the land they owned. Thereafter a contract was entered into between them and the two corporations thus formed. It required…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hill v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Younger v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Eldredge v. Mill Ditch Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Matthews v. Town of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. ARC LifeMed, Inc. v. AMC-Tennessee, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
  2. McGee v. BestCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
  3. Goodwin v. CastletonWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Bourne v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1981
  5. State of California v. State Tax CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API