Legal Opinion

United States v. Serawop

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 6, 2005No. 04-4082PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

This appeal requires us to decide what mental state is required to convict a defendant of voluntary manslaughter under 18 U.S.C. § 1112 and to determine how district courts must instruct juries regarding that mental element. We hold that, in order to convict a defendant of voluntary manslaughter under 18 U.S.C. § 1112, the Government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant acted in the heat of passion with either (1) a general intent to kill, meaning that the defendant was aware that the result was practically certain to follow from his conduct regardless…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. United States v. Pineda-DovalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. SerawopCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  3. United States v. VisinaizCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. Melvin Ellis HollyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. WolfeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API