Legal Opinion

Bell v. East River Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1995No. 18903PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

A man constructing a metal building on his property was electrocuted when he came close to an overhead high power line. In its suit the Estate introduced a written agreement between the power company and the former property owner, a railroad, asserting the agreement made the power company legally responsible for the death. The trial judge declined to direct a verdict on liability and the jury ruled the deceased had assumed the risk. The Estate appeals and we affirm.

FACTS

In March of 1959, East River Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. (East River) executed a Pole and Wire…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Stormo v. StrongSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Nelson v. Nelson Cattle Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Mash v. CutlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. American State Bank v. AdkinsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Butterfield v. Citibank of South Dakota, N.A.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Alverson v. Northwestern National Casualty Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Thompson v. SummersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Prairie Lakes Health Care System, Inc. v. WookeySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Rumpza v. Donalar Enterprises, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Kreisers Inc. v. First Dakota Title Ltd. PartnershipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API