Securitypoint Holdings, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
35 U.S.C. § 103; Patent validity; Obviousness; Graham factors; Secondary considerations; Objective indicia of nonobviousness; hindsight bias.
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This is a patent infringement action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1498 (2012). Plaintiff, SecurityPoint Holdings, Inc. (“SecurityPoint”), alleges that the Transportation Security Administration (“TSA”) has infringed claims 1-4, 6-9, and 12-15. of U.S. Patent No. 6,888,460 (“460 patent”) by employing similar or identical means and method for recycling trays and carts at airport security screening checkpoints. Defendant has…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- American Hoist & Derrick Company, Cross-Appellee v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Securitypoint Holdings, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
- Securitypoint Holdings, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- Securitypoint Holdings, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021