Legal Opinion
Reich v. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc.
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided August 4, 1995No. 1:01-adr-00029PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MeAULIFFE, District Judge.
The Secretary of Labor filed suit to enforce an administrative subpoena served upon Defendant, Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. (the “Company”). The Company operates a firearms manufacturing plant in New Hampshire. The subpoena directed the Company to produce records and information related to potential workplace hazards that might be linked to multiple movement disorders, like carpal tunnel syndrome. Specifically, the Secretary sought to obtain the Company’s 1993 “OSHA 200 logs” and first report of injury logs. It also requested information or records relating to: (1)…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- In Re Subpoenas Duces Tecum Nos. A99-0001, A99-0002, A99-0003 & A99-0004District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1999
- Sturm Ruger v. USADistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1998
- United States v. ChristoDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1995
- United States v. Sturm Ruger & Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.