Legal Opinion

Bower v. Bowser

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1907PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From Marion: William Galloway, Judge. Suit for reformation of a written instrument and specific performance of it when reformed. Plaintiffs appeal from the decree dismissing the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Bean

This is a suit to reform a deed. On October 31, 1901, the plaintiff Bower and his coplaintiff, Livesley & Co., entered into a contract by which he bargained and sold and agreed to deliver to them 10,000 pounds of hops at 10 cents a pound, during each *183of the years from 1902 to 190(5. inclusive, to he grown on certain described real property. Livesley & Co. were to make certain advances each year for cultivating and picking purposes, which advances were to bear interest at the rate of 8 per cent per annum and to be a lien upon the crop, and upon the delivery livesley & Co. were to pay the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Backhaus v. BuellsOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Mitchell v. HolmanOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Epstein v. State InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  4. King v. HolbrookOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  5. La Vie v. ToozeOregon Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dolph v. Lennon's, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Boardman v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Hughey v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Hyde v. KirkpatrickOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Suksdorf v. Spokane, P. & S. Ry. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API