Legal Opinion

In re J.H.K.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 16, 2011No. 369PA10PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Chief Justice.

The sole issue before this Court is whether the Guardian ad Litem (GAL) volunteer is required to be present in the courtroom at a termination of parental rights (TPR) hearing. For the reasons stated herein, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals holding that N.C.G.S. §§ 7B-601 and 7B-1108 mandate the physical presence of the GAL volunteer during a TPR hearing. In re J.H.K., _ N.C. App. _, 695 S.E.2d 162, 167-68 (2010).

On 25 January 2007, the Guilford County Department of Social Services (DSS) filed a juvenile petition alleging that the minor children J.H.K. and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Hamlin v. HamlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. New Hanover County v. . SidburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. In re R.A.H.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  5. In re J.H.K.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Mayo Yarns, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  2. In re J.H.K.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  3. In re C.J.C.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2020
  4. In re C.J.C.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2020
  5. In re R.D.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API