Legal Opinion

Nathan Kariniemi v. City of Rockford

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 18, 2015No. A14-796PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SMITH, Judge.

We affirm the district court’s dismissal of respondents’ negligent-approval claims on the basis of statutory immunity and their negligent-design claims on the basis that contractors hired to • perform city functions are protected by common-law official immunity. But we reverse and remand the district court’s denial of appellant’s summary-judgment motion on respondent’s nuisance claim because the claim relates to the same conduct as respondents’ negligence-based claims.

FACTS

In 2001, appellant City of Rockford entered into an agreement with a developer to build townhomes on…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Filarsky v. DeliaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Nusbaum v. County of Blue EarthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Wiederholt v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  4. Olson v. Ramsey CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  5. Sletten v. Ramsey CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nathan Kariniemi v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API