Nathan Kariniemi v. City of Rockford
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SMITH, Judge.
We affirm the district court’s dismissal of respondents’ negligent-approval claims on the basis of statutory immunity and their negligent-design claims on the basis that contractors hired to • perform city functions are protected by common-law official immunity. But we reverse and remand the district court’s denial of appellant’s summary-judgment motion on respondent’s nuisance claim because the claim relates to the same conduct as respondents’ negligence-based claims.
FACTS
In 2001, appellant City of Rockford entered into an agreement with a developer to build townhomes on…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Filarsky v. DeliaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Nusbaum v. County of Blue EarthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Wiederholt v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Olson v. Ramsey CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Sletten v. Ramsey CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Nathan Kariniemi v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016