Legal Opinion

Howard v. Howard

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 31, 2016No. 01-14-00761-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Jane Bland, Justice

In this appeal from a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO), we determine the appropriate method for allocation of retirement benefits pursuant to the parties’ agreed divorce decree. In particular, we determine whether a divorce decree that ordered that one spouse receive one-half of any vested-retirement benefits that related to-the months of employee service during the marriage was limited to one-half of the employee’s payroll contributions to the plan. The trial court found the decree to be so limited and ordered that Stephen Howard pay Winnie Howard one-half…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Valence Operating Co. v. DorsettTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Italian Cowboy Partners, Ltd. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Reilly v. Rangers Management, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Gwendolyn BerryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  2. Guardianship of TischlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  3. Joseph Gulliksen v. Beverly Jo Gulliksen A/K/A Beverly Jo Rosing, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API