Verlander v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
1VIOON, J.
David Allen Verlander seeks reversal of a robbery and a felony murder conviction upon the ground that the Commonwealth denied him due process of law by using the testimony of a witness whom the Commonwealth’s attorney believed to be lying about the witness’ own involvement in the crimes. Verlander also maintains that the evidence was insufficient to prove robbery and felony murder premised on robbery. We affirm the judgment because we find that the Commonwealth’s attorney did not act improperly. We further find that the evidence was sufficient to prove the crimes of robbery…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Higginbotham v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
- Saunders v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1970
- Harris v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ragland v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993