Legal Opinion

In re Latasha J.

New York City Family Court

Decided June 30, 1989Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Howard Spitz, J.

The issue to be determined, on this pretrial motion, which is one of first impression, is whether the recent decisions of the New York Court of Appeals in People v O’Doherty (70 NY2d 479) and People v McMullin (70 NY2d 855) regarding the notice requirement of CPL 710.30 (2) apply to the Family Court Act notice requirement set forth in section 330.2 (2).

Respondent is charged with attempted grand larceny in the *209third degree and criminal mischief in the third degree for attempting to steal an automobile. Before the court is respondent’s omnibus pretrial motion…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. O'DohertyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. People v. BernierNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. People v. McMullinNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. People v. BoughtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API