Legal Opinion

State v. Young

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided April 27, 1994No. S-93-168PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*58 ACCELERATED DOCKET ORDER

Appellees, Bobby Dale Young and Cathy Almeta Wineland, were charged in the District Court of Tulsa County, Case No. CM-92-1344 with Operating a Place Where Beer is Sold Without a License in violation of 37 O.S.1991, § 163.11. Prior to the trial, both defense attorneys demurred to the information on the grounds that 37 O.S.1991, § 217 was not applicable to the offense and that no punishment statute existed for the alleged violation. The Honorable William Musse-man, Judge of the District Court, agreed with the defense attorneys, sustained the demurrer to the information…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. StoutCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949
  2. State v. RobinsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
  3. State v. HammondCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1989
  4. State v. OgdenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981
  5. Rowell v. SmithCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. STATE v. HUDSONCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2022
  2. STATE v. HURTCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
  3. STATE v. HURTCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
  4. STATE v. HURTCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API