State v. Hammond
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKS, Vice Presiding Judge.
The State, alternatively under 22 O.S. 1981, § 1053(1) or § 1053(3) has appealed the decision of the Tulsa County District Court, which dismissed Case No. CRM-87-123, holding that the evidence presented was insufficient to show force or violence as required by 21 O.S.1981, §§ 641 and 642.
We do not reach the merits of this case as the appeal must be dismissed insofar as it does not fall within the state appeals authorized by 22 O.S.1981, § 1053. A brief summary of the procedural history is necessary. Appellee, who was the defendant below, was charged with…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. BarnettCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1936
- City of Tulsa v. HaleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976
- State v. DurhamCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976
- State v. TruesdellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
- Ray v. StevensonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992
- State v. CampbellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
- State v. DavisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991
- STATE v. GILCHRISTCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2017
- STATE v. WARDCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2022
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.