Legal Opinion

City of Enid v. Wigger

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 5, 1905PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from the District Court of Garfield County; before Hon. C. F. Irwin, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Gillette, J.:

A motion to dismiss the proceedings in error herein has been filed in this court, which motion is, omitting the caption, in the following words:

“Comes now the said defendant in error, Clara Wigger, and moves the court to dismiss the said petition in error, filed in this case for the reasons: First, the case made filed in this cause was settled, certified and signed by the Hon. Clinton F. Irwin, the judge who tried the cause at a place outside of the fifth judicial district, in which said cause was tried, to wit, the city of El Reno, in the second judicial…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Atchison v. ByrnesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  2. City of Enid v. WiggerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stanard v. Sampson Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Chandler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Alexander v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. Whitely v. St. Louis, E. R. & W. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Greer v. MoormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API