Alexander v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.*
hAt issue is the appropriateness of summary judgment in a case where a car dealership, not acting as the direct seller to an injured plaintiff, is alleged to owe a duty to warn about the dangers of first generation airbag deployment in a vehicle manufactured prior to the national campaign that promoted revised warning labels. Specifically, the plaintiff purchased the 1995 Toyota Corolla in question from A-Quality Auto Sales, LLC, (“A-Quality”), a used car dealership that immediately purchased the vehicle from Lakeside Toyota after a trade-in. Several months after the plaintiffs…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Media Production Consultants, Inc. v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
- Meany v. MeanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Reaux v. Deep South Equipment Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
- Gammill v. Invacare Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
3Cited by19 opinions
- Roy Bufkin, Jr. v. Felipe's Louisiana, LLCSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2014
- Reynolds v. BordelonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2015
- Patricia Ayala v. Gabriel Building SupplyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- Coburn v. DixonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Byes v. Chrysler CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2021
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.