Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided September 27, 2013No. 2013-C-0756PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.*

hAt issue is the appropriateness of summary judgment in a case where a car dealership, not acting as the direct seller to an injured plaintiff, is alleged to owe a duty to warn about the dangers of first generation airbag deployment in a vehicle manufactured prior to the national campaign that promoted revised warning labels. Specifically, the plaintiff purchased the 1995 Toyota Corolla in question from A-Quality Auto Sales, LLC, (“A-Quality”), a used car dealership that immediately purchased the vehicle from Lakeside Toyota after a trade-in. Several months after the plaintiffs…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Media Production Consultants, Inc. v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
  2. Meany v. MeanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  3. Reaux v. Deep South Equipment Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Gammill v. Invacare Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2008

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Roy Bufkin, Jr. v. Felipe's Louisiana, LLCSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2014
  2. Reynolds v. BordelonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2015
  3. Patricia Ayala v. Gabriel Building SupplyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  4. Coburn v. DixonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Byes v. Chrysler CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2021

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API