Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Pullano

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 29, 1982No. 1309PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

In this appeal from a judgment of sentence imposed for possession of controlled substances, appellant contends that the contraband was seized as a result of an unlawful search and that his motion to suppress, therefore, should have been granted. We disagree and, consequently, affirm the judgment of sentence.

At 9:45 p. m. on April 18, 1979, Reading City Police were present at 927 North Ninth Street, Reading, for the purpose of executing a valid search warrant for an apartment consisting of the second and third floors of the building. One of the officers, Francis Drexler, smelled…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StonerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Commonwealth v. HarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Commonwealth v. BentleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. MerbahSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Vaillancourt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TrengeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. PalmSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Commonwealth v. StainbrookSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. DuellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Com. v. Orr, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API