Commonwealth v. Pullano
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge:
In this appeal from a judgment of sentence imposed for possession of controlled substances, appellant contends that the contraband was seized as a result of an unlawful search and that his motion to suppress, therefore, should have been granted. We disagree and, consequently, affirm the judgment of sentence.
At 9:45 p. m. on April 18, 1979, Reading City Police were present at 927 North Ninth Street, Reading, for the purpose of executing a valid search warrant for an apartment consisting of the second and third floors of the building. One of the officers, Francis Drexler, smelled…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. StonerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. HarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. BentleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. MerbahSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Vaillancourt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TrengeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. PalmSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. StainbrookSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. DuellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Com. v. Orr, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.