Legal Opinion

Jolly v. Dynegy Miami Fort, LLC

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided November 10, 2020No. 1:17-cv-00392Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION MARION D. JOLLY, et al., Plaintiffs v. Case No. 1:17–cv–00392 JUDGE DOUGLAS R. COLE DYNEGY MIAMI FORT, LLC, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court pursuant to both (1) Plaintiffs Marion Jolly and Randy Jolly’s Partial Motion For Summary Judgment, and (2) Defendants Dynegy Miami Fort, LLC and Dynegy, Inc.’s (together, “Dynegy”) Motion For Summary Judgment, in this negligence case (Docs. 65, 66). The Court held oral argument on those competing motions on October 6, 2020. From the briefing and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Taft Broadcasting Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  5. Lansing Dairy, Inc. v. EspyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API