Legal Opinion

Sola v. Sunny Slope Farms

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 10, 1964No. 18180PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Moss, Justice.

Carlos Fernando Sola and Jose Albert Sola, the respondents herein, who are dependent children of Fernando Sola, filed with the South Carolina Industrial Commission a claim for benefits under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, Section 72-1 et seq., Code of 1962, asserting that his death resulted from an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment with Sunny Slope Farms. The employer admitted that it was subject to and bound by the terms of the Act but denied that the employee sustained an injury, resulting in his death, by accident arising out of and in the course of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kunze v. Detroit Shade Tree Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Gallman v. Springs MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
  3. Eargle v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
  4. Fowler v. Abbott Motor Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  5. Walsh v. U. S. Rubber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Pierre v. Seaside Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  2. Howell v. Pacific Columbia MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  3. Beam v. State Workmen's Compensation FundSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  4. Bickley Ex Rel. Estate of Bickley v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
  5. Clade v. Champion LaboratoriesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API