Legal Opinion

State v. United States

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 2000No. Nos. 24473, 24474PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KIDWELL, Justice.

This Court granted permissive appeal from an interlocutory order of the Snake River Basin Adjudication (SRBA) district court. The SRBA court denied the motion of certain irrigation districts and canal companies to file a late response and granted in part their motion to participate in the subcase. We affirm. The SRBA court also held that diversion was not required to perfect the water right the United States claimed under Idaho’s constitutional method of appropriation. We reverse, holding that the United States may not utilize Idaho’s constitutional method of appropriation to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Sun Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Nielson v. ParkerIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Adams v. Portage Irrigation Reservoir & Power Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1937
  5. State, Dept. of Parks v. IDAHO DEPT, WATER ADMIN.Idaho Supreme Court · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. United StatesIdaho Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API