Legal Opinion

Latourette v. McKeon

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1895PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Livingston. (Person, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, C. J.

Defendant is sued as the maker of the following note:

“$200. Tyrone, December the 2, 1889.
“ One year from date, for value received, I promise to pay to John McKeon, or bearer, $200, with interest seven per cent.
“Charles McKeon.”

On the back of said note is indorsed the following writing and signature:

“I hereby sell and assign the within note to H. B. Latourette; guarantee the same free from all equities and offsets; that nothing has .ever been paid on note.
“Fenton, Oct. 21, ’92. Mrs. D. Hogan.”

Defendant and Margaret Hogan are brother and sister, and son and daughter of John McKeon, who died…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schofield v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Brown v. BellMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Hillman v. SchwenkMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Hillman v. SchwenkMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Jackson v. ColeMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Marquette v. WilkinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Bailey v. HoldenMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Reed v. WhippleMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Pease v. JenningsMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  5. In Re Refior's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API