Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Holden

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1897PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Barry; Smith, J. Bill by Frank Bailey against John Holden and others to remove a cloud from title. From a decree for complainant, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The original bill was filed by the complainant to remove a clond from the title to lands claimed to be owned by him. "The bill alleges that the complainant acquired his title through a conveyance made on the 21st of November, 1893, to him by his wife, Mary; that he went into actual possession of the land, and has remained in possession ever since; and that on the 10th of November, 1894, his wife, Mary, died intestate, and without issue. The bill avers that the defendant John Holden, on the day of the death of complainant’s wife, caused a conveyance of the premises in question from Mary Bailey…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ripley v. SeligmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Lautenshlager v. LautenshlagerMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Schuffert v. GroteMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Brown v. BellMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Hillman v. SchwenkMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Shepard v. ShepardMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Schmidt v. JenningsMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Beadle v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Newton v. FreemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Tackaberry v. MonteithMichigan Supreme Court · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API