United States v. Paul Oscar Pompey
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SEITZ, Circuit Judge.
Defendant, Paul Oscar Pompey, was convicted by the district court sitting without a jury of violating 50 U.S.C. App. § 462(a), in that he knowingly refused to obey the order of his local draft board to report for civilian work as a conscientious objector in lieu of induction into the Armed Forces. In this ap peal, defendant challenges the validity of his 1-0 (conscientious objector) classification on the ground that his local board should have granted him a ministerial exemption instead.
At the time he registered with the Selective Service System in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Dickinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Mulloy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Cox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- In the Matter of Petition of William D. Scott v. Commanding Officer, Commander Thomas M. Volatile and Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Julita David Robertson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Ralph MercadoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Association for Educational Development v. HaywardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- United States v. KlineDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
- United States v. Robert Mulson LathropCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Wright v. HendershotDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.