Legal Opinion

Moore v. Hursey Transp. Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 30, 1931No. 865PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMouton, J.

Defendant company executed a promissory note for $500 in favor of plaintiff company, September 30, 1930, payable in October, 1930.

The execution of the note is admitted, the sole defense being want of consideration.

The proof is that defendant was indebted to plaintiff in a sum exceeding $500 for insurance premiums. It is shown, and not disputed, that this note was given in part payment of the account for these premiums, and that the account was credited up to the amount of the note. This pre-existing obligation of the defendant constituted a legal consideration for the note which embodied a…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Quaintance v. CookLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. CHF Finance Discount "A" Co. v. HarrisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Phillips v. Holy Temple of Church of God & ChristLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Service Parts Co. v. CulpepperLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API