Service Parts Co. v. Culpepper
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
AYRES, Judge.
This is an action upon a promissory note executed and signed by defendant, payable to plaintiff.
The defense first urged concerns an alleged want or lack of consideration for the execution of the note. In this regard, it is contended that an account representing a pre-existing indebtedness owed by defendant to plaintiff was insufficient to constitute a sufficient consideration for execution of the note, inasmuch as, at the time the note was executed, the account had already prescribed.
*499The second defense, also predicated upon the account, is that the account was prescribed by the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In re the Succession of KuglerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1871
- Bernard Brothers v. DugasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
- Succession of AurianneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
- Quaintance v. CookLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
- Belknap Hardware & Mfg. Co. v. HearnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Harrison v. OcchipintiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
- T. E. Mixon Lumber Co. v. BoutteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
- Board of Levee Commissioners of Orleans Levee District v. Newport Ltd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
- CHF Finance Discount "A" Co. v. HarrisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966