Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Highland Heights v. Kee

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1975No. 74-993PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Although respondent does not expressly concede that her employment as a public school teacher constitutes other public employment in contravention of the charter of the city of Highland Heights, she does not oppose such conclusion as being the law of Ohio. See State, ex rel. Platz, v. Mucci (1967), 10 Ohio St. 2d 60.

The question raised by respondent is whether, under the charter, affirmative councilmanic action is a prerequisite to removal of a council member in a quo warranto action, and is councilmanic action the exclusive remedy for disqualification of such council member, in view of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Platz v. MucciOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State ex rel. Corrigan v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hitt v. TresslerOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State ex rel. Corrigan v. HaberekOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State ex rel. Grimshaw v. AtkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API