Legal Opinion

Cziraki v. Thunder Cats, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 20, 2003No. B159413PublishedCited by 1 opinion

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JOHNSON, Acting P. J.

A successful plaintiff in a minority shareholder’s derivative action appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for attorney fees. He contends the court’s judgment created a common fund and substantial benefit for defendant corporation, and thus the court should have awarded him fees. The trial court did not believe it could apply the common fund or substantial benefit doctrine in a derivative suit involving a close corporation with a small number of shareholders. The corporation argues the trial court was correct on that issue and even if it erred in refusing…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mandel v. HodgesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. Fletcher v. A. J. Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Glenn v. Hoteltron Systems Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Bosch v. Meeker Cooperative Light & Power Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  5. Interlake Porsche + Audi, Inc. v. BucholzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Consumer Cause, Inc. v. Mrs. Gooch's Natural Food Markets, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API