Legal Opinion

Nicholl v. Scaletta

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 26, 1982No. 81-720PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lorenz

Plaintiffs filed an action against defendant to recover damages for personal injuries sustained when their car was rear-ended by defendant’s car. The court entered a directed verdict against defendant on the issue of liability. The jury awarded zero damages to Herbert Nicholl and $500 to Mary Nicholl, an amount less than her claimed medical expenses and loss of wages. The trial court granted a new trial on the issue of damages with respect to Mary Nicholl only, and we granted leave for defendant to file an interlocutory appeal from this order pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 306 (Ill. Rev.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hulke v. International Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1957
  2. Palmer v. Avco Distributing Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Robbins v. Professional Construction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Jeffrey v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  5. Khatib v. McDonaldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Schultz v. NORTHEAST ILL. REGIONAL COMMUTER RAILROAD CORP.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Cancio v. WhiteAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  3. James Depass v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  4. Netto v. GoldenbergAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  5. Hinnen v. BurnettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API