Legal Opinion

Milwaukee Automobile Mutual Insurance v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1964PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

A number of issues are presented on this appeal concerning the negligence of Kuckuck. We first consider these issues.

1. Was any negligence on the part of Kuckuck in jailing to give a proper right-turn signal, as a matter of law, not causal?

Appellant’s first complaint is that any negligence on the part of Kuckuck in failing to give a right-turn signal was not causal. There is no merit in this contention.

“To make a finding of proximate cause there must be evidence upon which to reasonably conclude that Rice’s negligence affected Gilbertson’s conduct.”

Here, Miss Chambers testified that Kuckuck…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Merlino v. Mutual Service Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Fitzpatrick v. RiceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schueler v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Naden v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Sentell v. HigbyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1978
  4. Scholmer ex rel. Bye v. PerinaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
  5. Schueler v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API