Legal Opinion

Fitzpatrick v. Rice

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1956PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

In its decision on motions after verdict the trial court stated:

“The court has referred to the problem created by defendant’s after-verdiet motion as a simple one, when in fact it is one of the most troublesome that has been presented to the court for some time. The difficulty arises in determining whether there is any reasonable inference, from the evidence introduced, to sustain the jury verdict or whether such verdict is based on conjecture and speculation.
“The failure of Gilbertson to testify leaves a clear absence of any evidence which connects his conduct with defendant’s defaults or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Walker v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Felix v. SoderbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Beacon Bowl, Inc. v. Wisconsin Electric Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual Insurance v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Fitzpatrick v. RiceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API