Legal Opinion

Nexsen v. Nexsen

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 15, 1865PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the General Term of the second district who affirmed the decree of the surrogate of Kings county, who directed probate of the will of Sarah Kexsen, deceased.

1Opinion of the CourtDavies, J.

Sarah Kexsen, the testatrix, was a single woman, and previous to April, 1852, had resided in a house in Brooklyn with her sister Catharine. In this month her sister died, and she soon thereafter removed to the house of her brother, William Kexsen, in whose family she continued to reside until her death, in January, 1862. She was possessed of personal estate of the valué of about $15,000, and some real estate, the value of which does not appear; and, *230the respondent who was her only brother of the full blood living at the time, she went to reside with him. The appellants were a brother of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coffin v. . CoffinNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  2. De Witt v. . Barly and SchoonmakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  3. Clarke v. SawyerNew York Court of Chancery · 1846

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Post v. . MasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. In re the Estate of KelloggNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  3. Norton v. NortonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1872
  4. In re the Probate of an Instrument Alleged to be the Last Will & Testament of WesturnNew York Supreme Court · 1891
  5. In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of WhiteNew York Surrogate's Court · 1888

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API