Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Kellogg

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided September 28, 1935PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

The question of testamentary interpretation here propounded concerns the sum which Susan A. Darling is entitled to receive under the will and codicils of this testatrix.

All three instruments contain internal evidence of competent draftsmanship although their authorship has not been disclosed. The will and first codicil both bear the date of August 31, 1928, but are witnessed by different individuals. The second codicil is dated November 10, 1928.

The will contains twenty-seven numbered items, twenty-two of which bequeath general legacies of varying amounts to twenty-*704five individuals…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of GreenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. In re the Estate of McCaffertyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  3. Caulfield v. . SullivanNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  4. In re the Estate of WeilNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
  5. In re the Estate of GreenbergNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of PelcygerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  2. Succession of StallingsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  3. In re the Estate of CrespiNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  4. In re the Construction of the Will of MillerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951
  5. In re the Accounting of WeinbergNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API