Legal Opinion

Marcum v. Gallup

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 16, 1951PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STANLEY, Commissioner.

The holographic will of the late Mrs. Blanche Marcum Mims has been contested by her niece, Mrs. Eleanor Marcum Trout, and her nephew, Kermit Marcum, her only immediate heirs, upon the ground that the instrument was not wholly in the handwriting of the testatrix and that it was executed through undue influence of or in behalf of the beneficiary, her second cousin, Mrs. Blanch Bromley Kirby. The will bequeathed $500 in trust for the care of cemetery lots. It then reads: “Second — I hereby give and bequeath to my niece Eleanor Marcum Trout one dollar and to her brother…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Helm's Guardian v. NeatheryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  2. Stege v. Stege's TrusteeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  3. Kiefer's Ex'r and Ex'x v. DeibelCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  4. Barber's Exr. v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  5. Berryman v. SidwellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sutton v. CombsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967
  2. In Re Estate of McCauleyArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Florence v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Warnick v. ChildersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
  5. McCauley v. TalkArizona Supreme Court · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API